JannekeHolger.com

Home page 🪴

Practical Peace in daily living.

Tag: Peace

  • Radical Openness = Win-Win

    Radical Openness = Win-Win

    Holger: Are there any teachings that emphasize radical openness…

    … to encourage shining the light of awareness onto any thought, feeling or belief without shame, pride or embarrassment, because every insight is a win-win?

    Claude.ai:

    Yes — this orientation appears across many traditions and modern approaches, often described as the foundation of genuine awakening or psychological freedom. Here are some of the most notable:

        


        

    Contemplative Traditions

    Dzogchen (Tibetan Buddhism) Perhaps the most explicit formulation. The teaching of rigpa (pure awareness) holds that awareness itself is already open, luminous, and without bias. Any thought, emotion, or perception arising within it is self-liberated simply by being recognized — there is nothing to suppress or exalt. The metaphor is often a mirror: it reflects everything equally without preference.

        

    Zen Buddhism — “Beginner’s Mind” (Shoshin) Shunryu Suzuki’s teaching that the expert mind has few possibilities, the beginner’s mind many. Zen also uses koans to short-circuit the judging, categorizing intellect and drop into direct, undefended awareness of what is.

        

    Kashmir Shaivism Teaches that every experience — including confusion, desire, anger — is a manifestation of Shiva/consciousness. Nothing is outside awareness; everything is a doorway back to recognition of one’s own nature.

        

    Advaita Vedanta / Self-Inquiry Ramana Maharshi’s atma vichara (self-inquiry) turns awareness onto itself without shame or agenda. The question “Who am I?” is not answered conceptually but used to illuminate the one who is asking, dissolving even the idea that there’s something wrong to fix.

        


        

    Modern Teachers

    Jiddu Krishnamurti — Choiceless Awareness Perhaps the most radical modern articulation. Krishnamurti insisted that the moment you label an observation as “good” or “bad,” you’ve already moved out of direct perception into conditioning. He urged people to observe thought, fear, pleasure, and belief as they actually are — without the observer taking sides.

       

    Tara Brach — Radical Acceptance Explicitly Buddhist-influenced, she teaches that shame and self-judgment are themselves phenomena to be met with the same open awareness, not weapons to defeat other phenomena. Her RAIN practice (Recognize, Allow, Investigate, Nurture) is a structured method for this.

        

    Adyashanti A contemporary non-dual teacher who emphasizes that spiritual openness must extend even to one’s most embarrassing, contradictory, or “un-spiritual” thoughts — that the refusal to look is itself the only real obstacle.

         

    Rupert Spira Teaches that awareness is the single substance of experience, and that every thought or feeling — however dark — is an appearance within that awareness, never a threat to it.

        


        

    Psychological Approaches

    Internal Family Systems (IFS) — Richard Schwartz The concept of Self (with a capital S) is the open, compassionate, curious inner witness. The whole practice rests on the idea that no part of the psyche is bad — every part, even the most destructive, has a positive intent. This makes exploration genuinely safe.

        

    Byron Katie — “The Work” Encourages sitting with any belief — especially beliefs you’re ashamed of or attached to — and asking four simple questions. The model explicitly frames every uncovered belief as a gift, not a failure.

        

    Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Developed from cognitive science, but arrives at similar territory: defusion from thoughts means neither believing nor suppressing them, just observing. The stance is one of open curiosity toward whatever arises.

        


        

    The Common Thread

    Across all of these, the key structural insight is the same: the awareness that notices a thought is never contaminated by it. This means there is no thought, memory, desire, or belief that is too shameful or sacred to be looked at — because looking at it doesn’t make you it. Insight is always a win because you are never worse off for seeing clearly, even if what you see is uncomfortable.

    The opposite of this teaching — selective awareness, spiritual bypassing, or only allowing “acceptable” experiences into consciousness — is widely recognized across these traditions as the central trap that keeps people stuck.

    Would you like to go deeper into any particular tradition or teacher?

    Holger: What Bible references promote openness and bravery in facing personal issues?…

        

    Claude.ai:

    Here are some of the most resonant passages, organized by theme:

    Radical self-examination and honesty

    • Psalm 139:23–24 — “Search me, God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts.” Perhaps the clearest biblical invitation to undefended self-inquiry.
    • Psalm 51 — David’s unflinching confession after moral failure. The whole psalm models the courage it takes to stop rationalizing and look honestly at oneself.
    • Proverbs 28:13 — “Whoever conceals their sins does not prosper, but the one who confesses and renounces them finds mercy.” Concealment is named as the problem.
    • Lamentations 3:40 — “Let us examine our ways and test them, and let us return to the Lord.” A call to communal self-reckoning.

    Openness within community

    • James 5:16 — “Confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, so that you may be healed.” Healing is tied directly to relational transparency.
    • Galatians 6:2 — “Carry one another’s burdens.” Implies both the willingness to show your burden and to receive help carrying it.

    Courage and non-avoidance

    • Joshua 1:9 — “Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged.” Repeated three times in the same chapter — the emphasis suggests that fear was real and the command demanding.
    • 2 Timothy 1:7 — “God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, love, and a sound mind.” Fear is framed as something imposed on us, not native to who we are.
    • Isaiah 41:10 — “Do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God.” The promise of accompaniment is the basis for the courage asked.

    Approaching difficulty with trust rather than dread

    • Hebrews 4:16 — “Let us approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.” The text literally invites boldness (the Greek is parresia — frank, open speech) in bringing need forward.
    • 1 John 4:18 — “There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear.” Bravery here isn’t willpower; it’s the natural fruit of being loved.
    • Romans 8:15 — “The Spirit you received does not make you slaves, so that you live in fear again.” Freedom from fear is framed as the baseline of the spiritual life.

    A particularly Rohr-resonant thread: passages like Psalm 139, James 5:16, and 1 John 4:18 form a kind of arc — you become transparent before God, transparent before trusted others, and the love that meets you in that transparency gradually undoes the fear that drove concealment in the first place. That movement from hiding to exposure to healing is woven through both testaments.

  • Memory

    Memory

    Thank you Ralph!

    Memory comes up in the form of thoughts and images in the present moment like any other thought activity. So memory is a form of thought. Memories are present thoughts that arise and pass in present-moment awareness. Practically speaking, memory seems to be a function that ties together, coordinates and recalls former thoughts. It appears to store concepts and images and bring them forth. Conditioned beliefs, such as the notion of being a separate self and all the related identifications, survive in memory. Without memory, they have no substance, no continuity, no real existence. So, in a sense, you can say that all our problems are due to the capacity of memory. All of our beliefs, points of view and assumptions appear to be stored there. Furthermore, the reference point of a fixed ‘I’, thinker or self only resides in memory.

    Memory as a thing in itself is hard to pin down. It is like the concept of ‘the mind’. Where is ‘the mind’? There are thoughts passing through awareness, but where is ‘the mind’ apart from that? It is the same with memory. We posit such a function or entity, but where is it apart from the presently arising thoughts? It just so happens that we label some presently occurring thoughts as memories. Then we assume a past to which those memories refer. In this way, a whole conceptual world is spun up in thoughts. But they are all occurring here and now in present awareness. It is castles in air being constructed in thought. In a moment, we are conceiving of a past time, a past world, a past entity that was in that world, a memory to hold all that and ourselves as some of kind being present in the middle of all of it. But take a deeper look and see what is going on. In present awareness, present thoughts are appearing and disappearing. It is all purely conceptual, purely imagined. Time, the external world and the separate entity are all posited in thought. They are taken as real, but are not actually present as substantial things in themselves.

    This is easy to see in the case of a dream. You fall into a dream state. In that dream state, you have a discussion with a friend about something you did together five years ago (in the dream). A normal conversation occurs and you and your dream friend discuss various events that happened. Appropriate memories appear to corroborate everything. When you wake up you look back and see that it was all fabricated in the mind in the moment of dreaming. There was no past at all. Not to mention that there were no real dream characters either! It was all appearances taken as real. However, awareness stands beyond, free and untouched. It is not even in the dream. The dream is in it. It suffers no limitations occurring in the dream. The awareness itself is no limited appearance in the dream. It is not any particular entity or object in the dream. It is the same with our present awareness in this apparent waking state.

    Conventionally, you can say that the mind creates the notion of a substantial, independent self and that this belief is sustained in memory. There is no harm in that as far as it goes. But the truth is that it is all simply present thoughts. And there is no separate thinker or ‘me’ to be found.

    Your actual identity is that space-like, utterly free awareness itself. All self-centered thoughts are baseless, as there is no one to whom they apply. See this clearly and there is really nothing else needed. It is the heart of the matter. Seeing this, suffering, doubt, seeking and personal problems vanish entirely.

    John Wheeler

    Holger:

    “Before Abraham was I am.”

    “I am with you always.”

    “I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world.”

    “The world” is thoughts, feelings, perceptions.
    “Who do you say I am?”

    What are you?
    The answer is not in the mind, is not in the realm of thinking (this world). ❤️

  • Read Me First…

    Read Me First…

    This website is under construction 🕊️

    Holger and his websites can get easily confusing (-;

    JannekeHolger.com is intended to celebrate our being together.

    Heart-Posture.com could be a commitment device, to find clear words for the wordless, to disentangle the mind, to relax the me-contraction that is the root of our human suffering and sense of lack.

    JannekeCello.com is intended as a hub for Janneke – the Cello Player, for her Kammer Music and teaching students on the Monterey Peninsula.